Introducing The Canadian Problem Gambling Index

Video Gaming Device Inventory (VGDI) The 45 yes–no. ( 1998).2011 Sep;27(3):467-85.Butterworth-Heinemann.

The SOGS ( Lesieur & Blume, 1987 ) has been used in almost all problem gambling prevalence research across the United States, Asia, Europe, and Canada ( Shaffer, Hall & Vander Bilt, 1999 ; Sproston et al., 2000 ; Volberg, Abbott, Ronnberg, & Munck, 2001 ).

An evaluation of the scale . When you gambled, did you go back another day to try to win back the money you lost?

Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) Peer Reviewed:

Journal list menu Tools Follow journal Navigation Bar Menu Follow journal Tools More from this journal Additional links About Wiley Online Library Help & Support Opportunities Connect with Wiley Log in to Wiley Online Library Change Password Congrats! • This is an omnibus prevalence survey that examines gambling in various populations in Manitoba, including adolescent, adult, senior, women, and First Nation samples (n=3,119).Page 7 The Canadian Problem Gambling Index In determining the cut-point that discriminates low-risk from moderate-risk gambler sub-types (i.e., PGSI = 2 vs.

You also may like to try some of these bookshops , which may or may not sell this item. The response options attract the following scores:Co-Morbidity Gamble, drugs, alcohol 24. Report to the Queensland Government Treasury.Have you borrowed money or sold anything to get money to gamble?

• Items 7 and 9 further exacerbate the problems of the scale.
• The Centre for Gambling Research, Australian National University.The South Oaks Gambling Screen:
• At the expense of items that may more comprehensively measure harm, the PGSI instead includes items that may be responsive to cultural differences in gambling attitudes rather than problem gambling .
• A second set of yses examined the percentage of respondents in each gambling Table 4 Responses to PGSI by gambling subtype Item Gambling subgroup Low risk Moderate risk Problem (1270) (490) (147) Chasing mean .322 .769 1.73 Percent Yes 31.7% 52.7% 86.4% Felt guilty mean .291 .767 1.90 Percent Yes 28.3% 54.5% 90.5% Bet mean .276 .896 1.94 Percent Yes 26.2% 55.5% 91.2% Tolerance mean .102 .390 1.36 Percent Yes 9.9% 30.6% 70.7% Criticized mean .082 .357 1.35 Percent Yes 8.0% 27.3% 70.1% Felt problem mean .049 .349 1.69 Percent Yes 4.9% 28.6% 87.1% Health problem mean .075 .304 1.22 Percent Yes 7.2% 23.9% 66.7% Financial problem mean .026 .196 1.39 Percent Yes 2.6% 18.0% 76.2% Borrow mean .035 .120 .816 Percent Yes 3.5% 10.6% 48.3% 112 J Gambl Stud (2009) 25:105–120 123 subtype who reported engaging in each gambling activity (regardless of frequency) during the past year.1999; Stinchfield 2002).

Have you felt that you might have a problem with gambling?

• Esterman, A.
• ...Add a tag Cancel Be the first to add a tag for this edition Lists What are lists?
• The present research examined some of these issues using a combined data set made available by the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.
• The Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI; Ferris & Wynne, 2001) was ..; Inter-Provincial Task Force on Problem Gambling (Canada) Publisher:
• However, in the light of such a framework and the explicit model adopted, it is important to yse the actual items chosen for the PGSI.
• For example, they may sometimes spend more than they can afford, lose track of time or feel guilty about their gambling.
• Original Research Prevalence of Pathological Gambling in Quebec.

[Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse], [2001] Edition/Format: 21 Fun Casino Party Lesieur, H.R.

Elena Svetieva is a Research Associate at the Gambling Treatment Clinic. Content-negotiable representations Turtle (text/turtle) JSON-LD (application/ld+json) RDF/XML (application/rdf+xml) N-TRIPLES (text/plain) HTML+RDFa (text/html) 48115576 The Canadian problem gambling index :

It follows that research aimed at measuring problem gambling defined in terms of harm may be seriously misguided in using the CPGI prevalence index. From these tests, it is apparent that the nine-item PGSI is a reliable measure of problem gambling.

Items 7 and 9 further exacerbate the problems of the scale. Unfortunately, little attention has been given to the requirement to measure problems.

The second factor included a cluster of six behavior items (guilty, criticized, gambled more than could afford, felt gambling a problem, and chased) and household borrowing. Griffiths, M.

Family problems Family gambling problem 22

The fourth study into the extent and impact of gambling in Tasmania with particular reference to problem gambling: Casinos Austria Ag Annual Report Canberra, Australia:Delfabbro, P.

The fact that the responses to the nine items were not distributed evenly (for all but the problem gamblers) is consistent with the lack of correlation between these items for these groups.18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23. ( 2000).The developers of the CPGI believe that SOGS-derived items such as “receiving criticism” provide an appropriate measure of harm in that they “tap into the social context of gambling” ( Ferris & Wynne, 2001 , p. Report and Recommendations View Download Author Accessioned Available Issued Other Subject Type Metadata Abstract Refereed Sponsorship Corporate Faculty Publisher Doi Uri Collections Browse My Account Statistics Search Toggle Toolbox Search Top Sites Information Technology Human Resources Careers Giving Library Bookstore Active Living Continuing Education Go Dinos UCalgary Maps UCalgary Directory Academic Calendar My UCalgary Webmail D2L ARCHIBUS IRISS Faculty Websites Faculty of Arts Cumming School of Medicine Faculty of Environmental Design Faculty of Graduate Studies Haskayne School of Business Faculty of Kinesiology Faculty of Law Faculty of Nursing Faculty of Nursing (Qatar) Schulich School of Engineering Faculty of Science Faculty of Social Work Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Werklund School of Education Information TechnologiesIT Human ResourcesHR Careers Giving Library Bookstore Active Living Continuing Education Go Dinos UCalgary Maps UCalgary Directory Academic Calendar Libraries and Cultural Resources View Item    PRISM Home Alberta Gambling Research Institute Alberta Gambling Research Institute View Item   PRISM Home Alberta Gambling Research Institute Alberta Gambling Research Institute View Item Toggle navigationMenu JavaScript is disabled for your browser.In Study 2, the effectiveness of the CPGI profiler (CPGI-P) software, which graphically depicts problematic gambling-relevant attitudes and behaviours, was assessed.The scale as a whole contains 31 items (plus demographics) that cover gambling involvement, problem gambling assessment, and correlates of problem gambling ( Ferris & Wynne, 2001 ).

1. : Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, 2001] Physical Description 57 p.
2. Final report .However, each survey (with one exception) contained the nine PGSI items worded in an identical manner.
3. Depression Feelings of depression 31.
4. At the same time, none of the yses reported here involved any type of between-survey comparison, and hence the different survey procedures do not constitute an alternative explanation for any of the results reported here.Finally, the survey provided gambling/problem gambling prevalence information for the Nation and for individual Canadian provinces, and these data can be used as a benchmark for subsequent national or provincial studies.
5. User Name:

Original Research Prevalence of Pathological Gambling in Quebec. Poker Live Svizzera Of the four gambler types defined by the PGSI, non-problem, low-risk, moderate-risk and problem gamblers, only the latter category underwent any validity testing during the scale's development, despite the fact that over 95% of gamblers fall into one of the remaining three categories.Second, the survey provided a basis for comparison of the new instrument scored items with those from the DSM-IV and SOGS measures.

By the inventory used in the CPGI. The PGSI was subjected to two types of reliability testing; namely, internal consistency and repeated measures methods. 10.1007/s10899-008-9107-7.Although none are without major criticism, these earlier attempts give some guidance to the kind of reasoning needed to measure harm caused by gambling successfully.

not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first

Book, Internet Resource All Authors / Contributors: Replaced by the Problem Gambling Se Index (PGSI) of the Canadian Problem .. Indeed, any strong correlation with the SOGS and the DSM-IV should be expected, given that eight of the nine items in the index are based on SOGS and DSM-IV items.The second phase involved validity and reliability testing of the new instrument in a Canada-wide gambling prevalence study.

How often have you lied to family members or others to hide your gambling?

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Jewish Poker London The adult survey serves as a CPGI baseline study for this population as this instrument, as well as the SOGS, was utilized to discriminate gambler sub-types.You could win more if you use a certain system or strategy.However, if the gambling involves sufficiently small bets, no problems may follow. Seraganian.

CPGI ϭ Canadian Problem Gambling Index41 NR Tochkov 2009 108

• 10).
• Carolyn Nutter ARF, VP Community Health and Education 416-595-6135 [email protected] Nigel Turner ARF, psychologist, psychometrist 416-595- [email protected] Tony Toneatto ARF, psychologist, clinician 416-595-6828 [email protected] Nina Littman-Sharpe Donwood, clinician, head of gambling treatment program 416-599-1322 [email protected] Geoff Noonan Gambling counselor, Donwood [email protected] Roger Horbay Gambling counselor, Donwood [email protected] Jane Scott Gambling counselor, CFCG (Ontario) 416-499-9800 [email protected] Dr.
• AND Azzardo e Nuove Dipendenze – Responsible Gambling Council ..
• The Problem Gambling Se Index (PGSI) is the standardised measure of at risk behaviour in problem gambling.International Gambling Studies , 6, 147–174.
• Wynne, H.

Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, 2001] Physical Description 57 p

• McCready, J.
• Documents Similar To ..Shaffer, H.
• The response options attract the following scores:
• < http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1204310 > # Canada.2007) but the most well-known and frequently used measure has been the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) (Lesieur and Blume 1987).
•     schema:about < http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/37193453#Topic/compulsive_gambling_canada > ; # Compulsive gambling--Canada     schema:about < http://id.worldcat.org/fast/871971 > ; # Compulsive gambling     schema:bookFormat bgn:PrintBook ;    schema:contributor < http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/37193453#Organization/inter_provincial_task_force_on_problem_gambling_canada > ; # Inter-Provincial Task Force on Problem Gambling (Canada)     schema:contributor < http://viaf.org/viaf/146520980 > ; # Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
• Bob Markosky Saskatchewan Health [email protected] .ca Steve Christensen Saskatchewan Health [email protected] a Kevin Hanna Community Mental Health Services 306-778-5410 Jean Dunlop Saskatoon Health District, Addictions 306-655-4103 FAX:306-655-4115 Don Osga Mental Health 306-766-7800 Jim Worrel Prince Albert Health District 306-953-5671 FAX:The standard deviations for all gambling frequency measures differed over gambling groups (and the size of each group differed widely), and Levene’s test for the equality of variances was significant for each activity (all ps\.01).

The final issue concerned the construct validity of the PGSI. [Ottawa] :The CPGI has become the measure of choice throughout Canada and has also been used in Norway and Iceland ( McCready & Adlaf, 2006 ), New Mexico ( Volberg & Bernhard, 2006 ), and recently in the United Kingdom ( Wardle et al., 2007 ), as well as in Australian prevalence studies in Queensland ( Queensland Treasury, 2001 , 2005 ), Victoria ( McMillen, Marshall, Ahmed, & Wenzel, 2004 ), and Tasmania ( Roy Morgan Research, 2006 ).

Suicide Suicide ideation 32.Blume, S.B. What constitutes excessive gambling depends on the characteristics of the individual and the extent to which his or her circumstances will tolerate a greater or lesser expenditure of money and time on the activity.Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI).     schema:about < http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/37193453#Topic/compulsive_gambling_canada > ; # Compulsive gambling--Canada     schema:about < http://id.worldcat.org/fast/871971 > ; # Compulsive gambling     schema:bookFormat bgn:PrintBook ;    schema:contributor < http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/37193453#Organization/inter_provincial_task_force_on_problem_gambling_canada > ; # Inter-Provincial Task Force on Problem Gambling (Canada)     schema:contributor < http://viaf.org/viaf/146520980 > ; # Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.< http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/37193453#Topic/compulsive_gambling_canada > # Compulsive gambling--Canada     a schema:Intangible ;    schema:hasPart < http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85029466 > ;    schema:name "Compulsive gambling--Canada"@ en ;    .ab.ca British Columbia: Belle Of Baton Rouge Casino Parking

This issued is addressed in more detail in the discussion

This data consisted of responses from participants (18 years and older) in telephone surveys conducted in several different Canadian prov- inces between 2001 and 2005. Zynga Poker App for Android Download Check your advertising and operations meet the codes of practice.Page 3 The Canadian Problem Gambling Index METHODOLOGY The three-year Measuring Problem Gambling in Canada research project was conducted in two phases--a development phase and a testing phase.

1) often (score: The CPGI includes the nin-item Problem Gambling Se Index, which has been used extensively across Canada and in Australia, Great Britain, Iceland and Norway to measure the prevalence of problem gambling.

English Italiano Deutsch Espaol Franais Portugus. Behaviours and adverse consequences and introducing defined categories for non-problem.A research synthesis.

If you don't receive an email, you should register as a new user Email or Customer ID Please check your email for your password reset instructions.Images for canadian problem gambling inventory (cpgi) The CPGI's Problem Gambling Se Index scoring cut-off rules have been modified for the low-risk and moderate-risk subtypes. Conclusions:

1. Conclusions:
2. This instrument was constructed specifically to measure problem gambling in the general population.
3. Self-medication (drugs) 29.
4. South Oaks Institute.
5. Author information 1University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
6. The Canadian problem gambling index:Accordingly, sets of yses were conducted that computed the correlations between various gambling frequency measures and several different problem gambling measures (PGSI scores as a continuous variable, PGSI treated categorically, abbreviated version of the PGSI).

In Study 1, the scored items on the CPGI significantly correlated with those of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), yet their shared variance was low.Have you bet more than you could really afford to lose? For both activities, problem gamblers reported significantly greater frequency of both activities relative to the other gambling subtypes.

(PDF) Introducing the Canadian problem gambling index The Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) - Journal of .. 256 participants from across Canada were recruited from an online survey panel (Sample 1), and 61 participants from Toronto were recruited from a previous gambling study (Sample 2).

Strong, D.R. Petry, N.M. Jackie Ferris Harold James Wynne OCLC Number:

The original problem with the SOGS arose from it being validated using a clinical sample

Strong, D.R. For the latter subgroup, a quartermax rotation resulted in a readily interpretable structure with the first factor tapping awareness of the existence of a gambling problem (feel it’s a problem, .61; causes health problems, .72; causes financial problems, .57; criticized for gambling, .72), the second factor tapping dysfunctional behaviors (increased tolerance, .62; chasing, .74; borrowed/sold to get gambling money, .79), and a third factor consisting of two related items (bet more than could afford, .73; felt guilty about gambling, .70).

AND Azzardo e Nuove Dipendenze – Responsible Gambling Council .. Pirates Treasure Casino Florida Prepared for the Prince Edward Island Department of Health and Social Service.Found at these bookshops Searching - please wait..

Ferris, J. Unlike its nearest competitor—the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)—the PGSI was designed specifically for use with a general population rather than in a clinical context. The final issue concerned the construct validity of the PGSI. Profumeria Poker Messina Viale San Martino